Monday, April 23, 2018

The Washington Post finds that since the Columbine shooting in 1999 there have been 208,000 children exposed to gun violence in 212 schools.

Courtesy of WaPo: 

The Washington Post has spent the past year determining how many children have been exposed to gun violence during school hours since the Columbine High massacre in 1999. 

Beyond the dead and wounded, children who witness the violence or cower behind locked doors to hide from it can be profoundly traumatized. 

The federal government does not track school shootings, so The Post pieced together its numbers from news articles, open-source databases, law enforcement reports and calls to schools and police departments.

Since March, The Post has taken a closer look at states with fewer local news sources and searched more deeply for less visible public suicides and accidents that led to injury. 

The count now stands at more than 208,000 children at 212 schools. 

The Post has found that at least 131 children, educators and other people have been killed in assaults, and another 272 have been injured.

In 2018 alone, there have already been 13 shootings — the highest number at this point during any year since 1999.

The Post goes on to make the point that school shootings remain rare, and only a small percentage of school students are affected by them.

But I would counter with the fact that in most developed countries the number of school shootings are close to zero.

Which does not seem to make ours all that rare. At least not in America.

Instead I would argue that they are becoming less rare every year.

28 comments:

  1. Randall6:43 AM

    Can you imagine the OUTRAGE we'd be seeing from the right if it were MUSLIMS or IMMIGRANTS that were responsible for 208,000 children being terrorized by guns?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:26 AM

      OT?"There was a lot of warranted worry recently when a survey came out that suggested Americans - especially young Americans -
      didn't know much about the Holocaust.
      It was a wake up call for everyone who understands the inconceivable level of horror of that event. For those of us who were alive at the time of World War II, and especially the liberation of the concentration camps, the slow and surreal realization of the magnitude of the genocide was something we will NEVER FORGET.
      But time passes, generations of the present become generations of the past. It is inevitable that memories will fade some, but the less we let them fade through teaching history the better we will be.
      The exhortation of the philosopher George Santayana must echo in our MORAL consciousness: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
      This is especially vital in our current age when those in power in this country would will us to forget so much - our recent political history, the tainted story of racial injustice in our country, the specter of past corruption, and so much more. We must rail against the lies, gaslighting and obstruction of TRUTH.
      We must tell each other and ourselves about what was and has been - not only the bad but the good that can provide seeds of hope for the future.
      One of the great joys of my later life has been to spend time with my grandchildren - to tell them the stories of my life and of my times, to share the books of history that taught me. The chief reason for writing my latest book What Unites US was to try to etch the stories of history into something more permanent than my own memory with the hope that others could build from what I shared. But this is an endeavor in which we all can play a part.
      Try to reach out to people you know and maybe even others whom you do not know, to find ways to share your stories. Recommend books, volunteer to speak at local schools, maybe write a book of your own if you are so inclined. We must not allow this nation to become unmOOred from its HIS*sTORY.
      Our future depends on it."< Dan the Man Rather 4/20

      Delete
  2. Anonymous6:58 AM

    https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5addc5f2e4b009869bfb86b4

    The latest...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:41 AM

      http://field-negro.blogspot.com/2018/04/a-tale-of-two-waffle-houses.html

      https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/04/what-we-know-waffle-house-shooting-suspect-travis-reinking.html

      "in June 2017, he threatened someone with an AR-15, drove to a public pool, and exposed himself to people at the pool. Reinking’s father told police at the time he had taken four firearms from his son and locked them away, but when the father decided he wanted to move out of state, he returned them to his son. Police advised the father to lock the guns away again until his son received “mental help.”
      "when the authorities arrived to confiscate the weapons, Reinking’s father was there and asked to keep the weapons, according to the Post. After he showed them his firearms license and assured them he would keep the weapons from his son, the police agreed to let him keep them. Later, the father acknowledged he returned the guns to his son. One of those guns was the AR-15 Reinking allegedly used in the shooting." "Police said they believe he may have a pistol that is missing from his apartment."

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:19 AM

      "last July. He told a Secret Service guard that he had to speak to Donald Trump about something, then, when the guard told him he’d have to take a tour to see the White House, said he was a sovereign citizen and therefore had a right to “inspect” the White House
      "In 2017, there were also a couple of reports to police about Reinking’s erratic behavior about a month before he ran off to DC; in one, an employee of his father’s business — Travis had an apartment above the office — called police to say Reinking had come out of the apartment carrying a rifle and wearing a PINK dress; he yelled at the employee, “Is this what you fucking want?” then tossed the rifle in the trunk of his car and drove off. Near the same date, in another incident, Reinking showed up at a public swimming pool wearing “a PINK women’s housecoat,” then>
      dove into the pool and took off the coat and swam around in his underwear. When he got out of the pool, he shouted at lifeguards that he was a man and exposed his genitals to them"
      "He told the officer that it all started after he began writing to Taylor Swift> {Now Shania Twain?}

      Read more at https://wonkette.com/632934/maybe-nashville-shooters-dad-shouldnt-have-returned-his-guns-its-a-thought#xMSkmebO4BAhEtLM.99

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:18 AM

      2016 parents called police because he was telling them taylor swift was listening on his phone .

      So father knew two years ago he had mental issues but still gave him guns back.

      Delete
  3. Randall7:41 AM

    Well, what IS the acceptable number of children we're willing to have killed or wounded?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:05 AM

      Drafted>
      https://www.militaryfactory.com/vietnam/casualties.asp

      Volunteered>
      "After 4,486 U.S. soldiers died in Iraq and 2,345 U.S. soldiers died in Afghanistan, 1 MILLION U.S. soldiers wounded in both wars, and a potential cost of up to $6 TRILLION, a new group like ISIL now causes havoc in the Middle East.Sep 17, 2014"
      and counting....

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:14 AM

      Probably triple the number of fetuses.

      Delete
    3. According to the NRA and Republicans, there is no unacceptable number. Basically, infinity. No finite limit. I guess that’s why they are against abortion and birth control.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous8:11 AM

    'We need to save our children from ourselves"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:19 AM

      No we need to save our children from the NRA and gun nuts.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:18 AM

      Kenyon quote
      ;-)

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:33 AM

      https://www.politicususa.com/2018/04/23/white-house-busted-as-trump-lied-about-n-korea-agreeing-to-denuclearize.html

      ' have expressed THE WILL to denuclearize.'<Ok!

      https://www.politicususa.com/2018/04/23/washington-post-america-is-not-prepared-for-a-russian-attack.html

      '"every American who cares about freedom and democracy:“America is still unprepared for a Russian attack on our elections”
      "What we have instead of a paper trail that can be audited is a combination of voting machines, electronic voting rolls, vote-tallying servers and state elections websites — all of which are exposed to remote hacking by Russia or other hostile powers. In fact, these are exactly the types of electronic resources that Russian hackers infiltrated in 2016.

      “The surest way to secure the nation’s elections is to deter attacks in the first place. "
      "What the editors of the Washington Post are saying is that Donald Trump has dropped the ball, and is not protecting our country from another attack from his friend Vladimir. Perhaps our president wants Russia to continue to have success in attacking American democracy, since that may be what got him elected in the first place. If so, Trump’s lack of action is an example of treason of the highest order, and certainly is an impeachable offense."

      Delete
  5. Yeah, I saw this over the weekend at Kos. There's now an entire generation of K-to-grade 12 school kids who don't know a time before Columbine, and are actually skilled and versed in the most effective emergency means of barricading a classroom door.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous9:11 AM

    https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/watch-gun-nuts-shooting-300-yeti-coolers-company-cut-ties-nra/

    '...The howls of protests from NRA members included outraged gun owners filming themselves defacing and even shooting their Yeti coolers.'

    -Fecking idiots, all of 'em.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:26 AM

      https://www.ispot.tv/ad/AKwN/yeti-my-old-man-between-pulses

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:08 PM

      I've yet to understand how destroying an expensive thing is a protest; especially, if it was paid for out of one's own pocket.

      Delete
    3. What does Yeti care? Those coolers are already bought and paid for, plut it’s publicity. Those that hate the NRA will go out and buy one and those protest nuts already paid for theirs.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous10:14 AM

    FB part 1>"Another Sunday morning, another attack on the press from the President of the United States.
    "Sleepy Eyes Chuck Todd of Fake News NBC just stated that we..."
    Wait.
    Back up.
    Sleepy Eyes?
    Sleepy eyes? What? I asked (rhetorically I thought) my audience on Twitter, what does "Sleepy Eyes" even mean as an insult?
    Huh?
    Sleepy Eyes Chuck of the Fake News? I said, "it's like he's tweeting really bad fanfic one line at time. Fifty Shades of Fly Hair Tiny Hands."
    Sleepy eyes.
    Ok. Sure.
    Except ... well, I should have known better. Several readers pointed out that "sleepy eyes" is an anti-Semitic dog-whistle, a racist insult regarding Jews.
    And I thought, no, that can't be ... right, can it?
    It can. It is. And it's far worse than that.
    I did not know "sleepy eyes" was an anti-Semitic slur.
    But it sure didn't take long to find the truth.
    The term's origin comes from a list of criteria used by Nazi secret police to determine who might be a jew. This list includes traits such as a widow's peak, dark curly hair, attached earlobes, weak or pointed chins, thick lips with a commonly protruding lower lip, head shape including a low sloped forehead and high flat back of skull ... and thick eyelids giving a wary expression of "sleepy, untrustworthy eyes."
    This list was promulgated to the German population via the Gestapo and other Nazi authorities, and commonly used to identify suspected Jews for arrest and removal.
    After WWII and the Nazi's defeat, that list naturally found it's way to various neo-Nazi, White Supremacist, and other anti-Semitic groups.
    "How to spot a jew" is a common search phrase on Google, and the results are hundreds of variations on this list of Nazi-originated criteria.
    Chuck Todd is Jewish, a fact that Trump most certainly knows.
    It is unlikely in the extreme that Trump would pick "sleepy eyes Chuck Todd" as an insult at random and without malice aforethought.
    While Trump himself may or may not know the origin of the insult and who commonly uses that slur today, it's obvious he surrounds himself with people who use this term openly in the halls of government and business and who DO know what the phrase means and how it is intended.
    The President of the United States calling a Jewish person "sleepy eyes" isn't funny or clever or harmless.
    There are echoes of the Holocaust ringing in that phrase.
    If Trump DOESN'T honestly know that he's engaged in an anti-Semitic slur (and I am loathe to grant him that benefit of doubt), one of Nazi origin, that doesn't make it better, it makes it WORSE.
    It makes it worse, because this tells you, Citizen, who he surrounds himself with and how Trump's willful blithe ignorance of history enables and encourages their shameless hate and bigotry.
    More than anything, this is yet another indicator of just how dangerous and unqualified Trump is to be leader of any nation, let alone the United States of America."<J.W.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous10:15 AM

    FB Part2" Addendum:
    Of course, I'm now inundated with apologia from myriad Trump supporters. That's NOT what he meant, they tell me.
    Here's a representative sample: "Sorry your 'sleepy eyes' breakdown is BS. Calling it a dog whistle is a self serving way to accuse people with no evidence."
    I call a dog whistle a dog whistle. Pretending that such doesn't exist is just another way to dismiss hate and bigotry. That said, I'm impressed that he spelled all the words correctly, managed to avoid any overt racism, and didn't call me a .
    Here's the thing: there's PLENTY of evidence.
    Let's look at the context, shall we?
    Crazy Joe Biden: An obvious poke at the former VP's mental health. A common insult. Crazy.
    Jerry Moonbeam Brown: Obviously a dig at hippy, liberal California.
    Crooked, Lyin' Hillary: Dishonest, criminal, liar, these are the things that Trump often says about his erstwhile opponent. The context of which is 30 years of Republican attacks on Clinton.
    Leakin, Lyin, "Shadey" James Comey: Again, the context is obvious. Trump says Comey leaked classified documents to the press, that he lied about it and about Trump, and that he's an untrustworthy operator all around.
    Liddle Bob Corker: A play on "little." Corker is small in statue and small in Trump's opinion.
    Lyin' Ted, Jeff Flakey, Cheatin' Obama, Cryin' Chuck, Big Luther, Lamb the Shame, Pacohontas, Rocket Man, Sloppy Steve, Dumb Mika, Crazy Megyn. All of these insults are obvious in context. Why Trump used these particular labels, liar, cheater, crazy, shady, big, small, sloppy, for his various targets is easy to figure out.
    But "sleepy eyes?"
    What's the context?
    What's the insult? If it's not an anti-Semitic slur common to every single white supremacist and anti-Semitic website I've spent the day looking at, then where did it come from? What's the context? What's impetus?
    Sleepy eyes?
    But, okay, sure, I'll concede that another interpretation IS possible.
    Chuck Todd's eyes are no different, no more "sleepy" than anybody else's. They appear normal in every way.
    It's an odd label, "Sleepy eyes." From Trump's history (see above, et al), from the context of his tweet, it was obviously intended to be offensive. But the insult isn't at all obvious. If Trump had attacked Todd's weight, or his mental health, or his political ideology, or his stature, or his ratings, etc, it would be obvious. But what's the context of "sleepy eyes?"
    Sleepy eyes.
    And it's damned coincidental, isn't it? Damned peculiar. Damned suspicious. Given Todd's ethnicity and Trump's proclivity to that sort of insult: See "Pocahontas" for example. Given that Trump himself was raised by a father who was arrested in 1927 for marching with the KKK.
    But I'll bite.
    Sure. I'll bite. Why not?
    Tell me, what DID Trump intend with this insult?
    What prompted it? Who did Trump hear it from? What was the impetus of the label?
    What did he REALLY mean.
    Come now, let's have it." <Jim Wright

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:37 AM

      ex·e·crate 'chucky toad'

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:44 AM

      I think that Jim Wright nailed it on the head. trump is a bigot, racist, misogynist and everything else that is reprehensible. And he's proud of it because it pleases the fools who support him.
      Beaglemom

      Delete
  9. Anonymous10:37 AM

    This morning our local newspaper had an excellent op-ed written by an area high school senior who, like so many of us think that the gun "culture" in the US and the current misreading of the Second Amendment need to change.
    Beaglemom

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:16 AM

      More info>Bglmom>Please share...Link? Quote?

      Delete
  10. Anonymous1:42 PM

    "CONservative parents are keeping kids home from school today in a boycott protesting comprehensive sex-ed they are calling “pornographic.” Some, like the Family Research Council, are likening sex-ed to child molestation, using the hashtag, #HandsOffOurKids.

    https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/coming-children-conservative-parents-going-bonkers-comprehensive-sex-ed/

    "“Pornographic sex ed is being implemented across our globe in an attempt to indoctrinate our children with ‘sexual rights,’ ” a letter parents are being urged to send to their children’s schools reads, the right wing Washington Times reported earlier this month “This is unacceptable and [I am] joining others both nationally and globally in taking a stand to say ‘enough!’ “"Here’s a video Johnson posted to Facebook last month, titled, “They Are Coming For Our Children!”"

    https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/coming-children-conservative-parents-going-bonkers-comprehensive-sex-ed/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good. Teachers are probably heaving a sigh of relief, having a day without having to deal with disruptive, defiant, spoiled entitled little shits

      Delete
  11. Anonymous2:02 PM

    these are copycat crimes.people who want to be noticed have seen how easy it is to be spotted by killing kids. no where is safe anymore-not church, not school, not the movies, not a waffle house. how long before it starts happening at our homes?

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.